Copyright Litigation

Published: 2 December 2014

  • People

    Thierry Calame
    Managing Partner, Co-Head of Intellectual Property
    M. Sterpi

  • Expertise

    Intellectual Property
    Litigation and Arbitration

The 2nd edition of Copyright Litigation: Jurisdictional Comparisons offers clear guidance for anyone considering litigation in a foreign country or involved in a multijurisdictional copyright litigation. Adopting a country-by-country approach, with a common format for each country, it enables quick and accurate comparisons between jurisdictions.

This title:

  • Covers the law and procedure in more than 25 major jurisdictions
  • Features contributions from leading local practitioners who are experts in the field
  • Offers a well organised starting point for international reference
  • Answers the key questions of multinational corporations and their legal advisors
  • Sets out each country’s courts and administrative system
  • Goes through civil court procedure
  • Explains the available remedies
  • Looks at the available enforcement options
  • Covers litigation costs
  • Uses a reader-friendly Q&A format that enables quick and easy cross-jurisdictional comparisons
  • Provides straightforward, practical commentary on each jurisdiction and the respective legal Systems

Related publications

SEE ALL

Insights

Insights – 09.09.2024

Federal Patent Court highlights the importance of protective briefs

Federal Patent Court highlights the importance of protective briefs

In a recent landmark decision, the Federal Patent Court underscored the critical role of protective briefs in preventing preliminary injunctions (PIs). The court reaffirmed its practice of rejecting PI requests without notifying the alleged infringer when a compelling protective brief is on file.

Insights – 10.04.2024

Climate change landmark case – European Court of Human Rights condemns Switzerland for not doing enough against climate change

Climate change landmark case – European Court of Human Rights condemns…

In a historic ruling, the European Court of Human Rights ("Court") found that the European Convention on Human Rights ("Convention") encompasses a right to effective protection by the State authorities against the adverse effects of climate change. The Court found that Switzerland had failed to act in a timely and sufficient manner to adopt and implement relevant legislation and measures to mitigate climate change, violating Article 8 of the Convention. Although the judgment is final and binding, the Court did not order Switzerland to take specific measures to comply with the ruling. This new case law will undoubtedly have a significant symbolic and political impact. While the rights protected under the Convention are not directly applicable to private entities such as companies, the judgment may however add further momentum to so-called horizontal climate change lawsuits brought against private entities.

SEE ALL
Lenz & Staehelin {PAGENO}/{nbpg}
{PAGENO}/{nbpg}