The Provisional Timetable in International Arbitration

Published: 10 August 2005

  • PEOPLE

    P.M. Patocchi
    Harold Frey
    Partner, Head of Litigation and Arbitration

  • Expertise

    Litigation and Arbitration

Related publications

  • 01 Apr 2025

    Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit und Kartellzivilrecht

    Neue Impulse und bestehende Herausforderungen für die Anspruchsdurchsetzung, Zurich-Geneva 2025

    AUTHORS

    Yves Loher
    Expertise

    Litigation and Arbitration

  • 09 Sep 2024

    Zur Parteirollenverteilung im Arresteinspracheverfahren nach Art. 278 SchKG

    in: Peroz A., Haldy J., Piotet D. (Hrsg.), Du Plaict aux plaideurs – Mélanges en l'honneur du Professeur Denis Tappy

    AUTHORS

    Jürgen Brönnimann
    Philip Lengacher
    Expertise

    Litigation and Arbitration

SEE ALL

Insights

Insights – 14.02.2025

Swiss sanctions against Russia – Further alignment with the EU 15th Sanctions Package

Swiss sanctions against Russia – Further alignment with the EU 15th…

In a continued effort to align with European Union ("EU") sanctions, on 12 February 2025, the Swiss Federal Council implemented additional measures to align with the EU 15th sanctions package. The new Swiss restrictions, which primarily concern extended divestment deadlines and reinforced measures regarding court rulings involving Russian companies, came into force on 13 February 2025.

Insights – 10.04.2024

Climate change landmark case – European Court of Human Rights condemns Switzerland for not doing enough against climate change

Climate change landmark case – European Court of Human Rights condemns…

In a historic ruling, the European Court of Human Rights ("Court") found that the European Convention on Human Rights ("Convention") encompasses a right to effective protection by the State authorities against the adverse effects of climate change. The Court found that Switzerland had failed to act in a timely and sufficient manner to adopt and implement relevant legislation and measures to mitigate climate change, violating Article 8 of the Convention. Although the judgment is final and binding, the Court did not order Switzerland to take specific measures to comply with the ruling. This new case law will undoubtedly have a significant symbolic and political impact. While the rights protected under the Convention are not directly applicable to private entities such as companies, the judgment may however add further momentum to so-called horizontal climate change lawsuits brought against private entities.

SEE ALL
Lenz & Staehelin {PAGENO}/{nbpg}
{PAGENO}/{nbpg}