U.S. pretrial discovery on Swiss soil

Published: 1 December 2010
  • People

  • Expertise

    Banking and Finance
    Litigation and Arbitration

Contrary to the approach followed in civil law jurisdictions, where the taking of evidence is a sovereign function that is primarily performed by the judicial authority, common law jurisdictions, such as the U.S., consider that the collection of evidence is primarily incumbent upon the litigating parties. The civil procedure rules that apply in common law jurisdictions provide for extensive disclosure obligations during the pretrial discovery phase. In situations where the requested information is held by entities or persons in Switzerland, the disclosure obligations that arise under the U.S. (state or federal) procedural rules often conflict with a number of Swiss statutes. This contribution examines and discusses how the tension between the U.S. procedural requirements and the Swiss prohibitions has been, or should be, dealt with both at a national level and under the Hague Conventions dealing with international judicial assistance in civil matters.

1st Edition, 148 pages, Paperback, ISBN 978-3-7190-3043-8, CHF 58, Helbing & Lichtenhahn Verlag, Basle 2010.


Insights 27.05.2024

Proposed introduction of a Federal Register of Beneficial Owners

Proposed introduction of a Federal Register of Beneficial Owners

The Swiss Federal Council has adopted a bill proposing significant amendments to Switzerland's anti-money laundering (AML) framework for submission to Parliament. A key feature of this reform is the introduction of a new federal "transparency register", in which companies will be required to record information about their beneficial owners.

Insights 10.04.2024

Climate change landmark case – European Court of Human Rights condemns Switzerland for not doing enough against climate change

Climate change landmark case – European Court of Human Rights condemns…

In a historic ruling, the European Court of Human Rights ("Court") found that the European Convention on Human Rights ("Convention") encompasses a right to effective protection by the State authorities against the adverse effects of climate change. The Court found that Switzerland had failed to act in a timely and sufficient manner to adopt and implement relevant legislation and measures to mitigate climate change, violating Article 8 of the Convention. Although the judgment is final and binding, the Court did not order Switzerland to take specific measures to comply with the ruling. This new case law will undoubtedly have a significant symbolic and political impact. While the rights protected under the Convention are not directly applicable to private entities such as companies, the judgment may however add further momentum to so-called horizontal climate change lawsuits brought against private entities.