Le contrat de planification - Utilité, admissibilité et régime du contrat d’aménagement du territoire

Published: 15 June 2016

  • PEOPLE

    Nathalie Adank
    Associate

  • Details

    Number of pages
    430 pages
    Publisher
    Schulthess Verlag
    Language
    French
    Price
    CHF 89.00
    ISBN number
    978-3-7255-7552-7

Le contrat de planification est de plus en plus utilisé par les collectivités publiques afin d’associer les administrés à la poursuite de l’intérêt public à l’utilisation judicieuse et mesurée du sol. Cette thèse de doctorat de l’Université de Fribourg s’attache à présenter l’utilité d’un tel instrument, particulièrement après la révision de 2012 de la loi fédérale sur l’aménagement du territoire, qui a mis un accent particulier sur la question de la disponibilité du sol. Elle analyse la façon dont le contrat de planification peut se conformer aux principes généraux de droit public que sont la légalité, l’égalité de traitement, la proportionnalité et l’intérêt public. Elle étudie ensuite quelles sont les règles qui devraient s’appliquer au contrat de planification à défaut d’un régime légal spécial. L’étude se termine par une proposition de quelques dispositions légales, qui pourraient être intégrées aux lois cantonales sur l’aménagement du territoire.

Die Schlussfolgerungen der Dissertation liegen in deutscher Übersetzung vor.

Related publications

SEE ALL

Insights

Insights – 12.11.2025

Swiss sanctions against Russia – Further alignment with the EU – Implementation of the 18th Sanctions Package

Swiss sanctions against Russia – Further alignment with the EU –…

In a continued effort to align with European Union ("EU") sanctions, on 29 October 2025, the Swiss Federal Council implemented further measures transposing the core elements of the European Union's 18th sanctions package adopted on 18 July 2025. The new Swiss measures entered into force on 30 October 2025 and reinforce the existing framework through expanded trade restrictions, energy-sector prohibitions, transaction bans affecting Russian financial institutions and sovereign funds, as well as new software and service restrictions, while enhancing procedural shields against foreign proceedings for Swiss operators. For reference, the European Union has already moved to a 19th sanctions package, and certain elements of the 18th package adopted at EU level, such as the measures relating to some Chinese financial institutions, are not included in the present Swiss revision.

Insights – 11.11.2025

Taking of evidence in aid of cross-border civil proceedings – it’s getting (somewhat) easier in Switzerland

Taking of evidence in aid of cross-border civil proceedings – it’s getting…

Videoconferences are nowadays widely used for the examination of parties, witnesses and experts in cross-border civil proceedings. To date, however, in Switzerland the participation in a foreign court hearing by means of a videoconference requires prior authorization by the Swiss authorities. Failing to abide by this requirement is not an option, as this would run afoul the Swiss blocking statute, a criminal offence. To facilitate the voluntary participation in foreign litigation proceedings through electronic means – which is often in the best interest of Swiss-domiciled parties –, the Swiss parliament enacted new provisions on the use of electronic means of communication in cross-border civil proceedings. As of 1 January 2026, it will thus no longer be necessary to obtain prior authorization for participating in a foreign court hearing. A prior notification to the Swiss authorities will suffice, provided certain guidelines are followed. In addition, the new provisions ease the restrictions for the voluntary production of information in aid of foreign civil proceedings.
SEE ALL
Lenz & Staehelin {PAGENO}/{nbpg}
{PAGENO}/{nbpg}